# Step 4: Run PERMANOVA

Once the design file is created, we are ready to go ahead with the PERMANOVA analysis.
1. Click on the '<ins>Jaccard</ins>' resemblance matrix in the Explorer tree so that it is the active item in the workspace, then click **PERMANOVA+** > **PERMANOVA...**

[![20._PERMANOVA_menu.png](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/scaled-1680-/20-permanova-menu.png)](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/20-permanova-menu.png)

2. Check to see that the 'Design worksheet:' is <ins>Design1</ins>; this is the design file we created in the previous step that contains the three-way nested design. For the rest, we will keep the defaults in the PERMANOVA dialog, as shown below, then click **OK**.

[![21._PERMANOVA_dialog.png](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/scaled-1680-/21-permanova-dialog.png)](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/21-permanova-dialog.png)

3. This produces an output file (called '<ins>PERMANOVA1</ins>') in the Explorer tree. It shows:
- the details of the choices you made in the PERMANOVA dialog to run the analysis;
- the details of your experimental design; and
- the PERMANOVA table of results

as follows:

[![22._PERMANOVA_results_file_HF.png](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/scaled-1680-/22-permanova-results-file-hf.png)](https://learninghub.primer-e.com/uploads/images/gallery/2026-02/22-permanova-results-file-hf.png)

#### Interpretation
These results show that there is statistically significant variability in the identities of molluscs among holdfasts at each of the three spatial scales in the experimental design: **Areas** ($F_{8,64}$ = 1.23, $P$ < 0.01), **Sites** ($F_{4,8}$ = 1.36, $P$ < 0.05) and **Locations** ($F_{3,4}$ = 2.81, $P$ < 0.05). Note that the p-value for Locations is somewhat limited by the number of unique values of the pseudo-F statistic under permutation that are available here. Specifically, when we permute 2 samples per group (i.e., the 8 Sites) randomly across 4 groups (the Locations), there are just 105 unique values of pseudo-F that can be obtained, so the minimum possible p-value here is 1/105 = 0.0095).